Currently set to Index
Currently set to Follow
search
ask age2b
CART

The diagnostic value of miRNA-141 in prostate cancer: A systematic review and PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis

By AGE2B team
November 16, 2021
0
0

Yun Ye 1, Xiao-Hua Yuan 1, Jian-Jun Wang 2, Yu-Chen Wang 1, Su-Liang Li 1

Main idea: This meta-analysis suggests that miR-141 has a high diagnostic value for prostate cancer. In the future, large-scale prospective studies are needed to verify and evaluate this result.

Abstract

Background: miR-141 has gradually demonstrated its value in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. However, the diagnostic parameters in previous studies differ. A systematic review was conducted to explore the diagnostic value of miR-141 in prostate cancer.

Methods: A comprehensive search of the literature in the PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases was performed. The included 7 studies assessed the diagnostic value of miR-141 in patients with prostate cancer up to October 31, 2019. We used meta-disc version 1.4 and STATA software version 12.0 to analyze the data.

Results: The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.70 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64-0.75) and 0.73 (95% CI 0.64-0.80), respectively. The positive likelihood ratio was 2.88 (95% CI 1.40-5.93), and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.38 (95% CI 0.20-0.71). Further, we note that the pooled diagnostic odds ratio of miR-141 for prostate cancer was 9.94 (95% CI: 2.55-38.80). The summary area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.83 (95% CI: 0.79-0.86). The results of meta-regression suggested that heterogeneity was mainly derived from patient age. The results of the Fagan nomogram showed that it was increased significantly by testing miR-141 for diagnosing prostate cancer.

Source NIH

Leave a Reply

Ask your question

We read all your emails and your text. Your question will be responded by our specialists, or one of the doctors we're working with, or our community

Please complete the required fields.